<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>AttentionMax - Latest Comments in Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://attentionmax.disqus.com/</link><description>Max Kalehoff on the hidden sides of marketing, technology and life.</description><atom:link href="https://attentionmax.disqus.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:52:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-39002038</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It depends how you define it -- and no matter how you approach it,&lt;br&gt;it's messy. Here's a highly unscientific segmentation and estimate,&lt;br&gt;based little recent research and mostly my finger in the wind. Pure&lt;br&gt;third-party social media analytics products is probably just a few&lt;br&gt;hundred million at most. The social media research/analytics&lt;br&gt;professional services industry, including pureplay vendors and&lt;br&gt;agencies that provide related services, is probably a billion or more.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maxkalehoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:52:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-38970599</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Max,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Can you comment on the size of this social media metrics(social media analytics) market ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">karthikanantharamu</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 03:12:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-1746294</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed this article - a super round-up on the state of the art. Max, I think you make an excellent point when you talk about the arsenal of metrics available.  Arguably, the online environment is bringing together the individual marketing disciplines; with far greater interaction and effect between PR, advertising and the greater marketing environment. Measurement can only become more complicated in a cross-discipline world and while I think there will still be a demand for measurement specialists, I also believe the greater marketing community needs to get educated on the selection of metrics available. Most importantly they need to make measurement important from a campaigns very inception, ensuring that all elements have some sort of measureable feed-back connection.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">michaelblowers</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 04:30:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-1746293</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Awesome. I think there's an entire story left to tell about business silos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmorrissey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 00:58:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-1746291</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Brian: Thanks for your latter comment. That was largely along the essence. I would've like to have seen you push the embracement of social media by different business silos and operations, but, again, I understand the constraints. I think my first comment in our interview was "Good luck on tackling a complex issue!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Stephen: Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">maxkalehoff</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:23:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-1746290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Max-&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I really enjoyed this post. I think the second paragraph is really concise and great explanation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;S&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Stephen Tompkins</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 17:06:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Social-Media Metrics In Their Infancy</title><link>http://www.attentionmax.com/social_media_metrics_in_their_infancy#comment-1746292</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey,&lt;br&gt;Thanks for the help with the story. Sorry I demoted you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I tried to cover the more expansive view of social media later in the story. Admittedly, it's hard to cover all the bases in a 1600-word story, but this is one I tried to touch. Here's one part: "The challenge is conversations that cut across organizational silos. A single data set of customer feedback can apply to the marketing department wanting to know if its messages resulted in increased share of voice versus its competitors; customer service eager to know of problems before they ignite a firestorm; and product management in search of insights into unmet customer needs. No one set of metrics can apply to such a diverse set of constituencies,"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;-B&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bmorrissey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 10:25:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>